Chapter 6: Democratic Rights
Politics • Class 9 • Class 9 Democratic Politics
6
Democratic Rights
Saved in DatabasePolitics • Class 9 • Class 9 Democratic Politics
Prelims High-Yield Explanations & Traps
- in Poland? Why are
- some features of a democracy
- in the
- This is only an
- to experience democracy and its absence
- that the Council cannot take a decision if any permanent member says no to that decision
- renaissance)
- ‘I forbid’
Essential Definitions & Formulas
- DEMOCRATIC POLITICS OVERVIEW This book
- about democracy.
- These stories are meant to give a sense of what it
- to experience democracy and its absence.
- The focus in this chapter
- on democracy within a country.
- Poland
- famous for its poster art.
- Democracy
- a form of government that allows people to choose their rulers.
- This
- what the three maps shown here do.
- Historical data for these maps
- taken from Polity IV Project dataset of Universtiy of Maryland.
- This
- called ‘universal adult franchise’ or ‘universal suffrage’.
- This
- only an illustrative list from different parts of the world.
- Do you think it
- good to elect someone President for life? Or is it better to hold regular elections after every few years? RR RR R ee ee e cc cc c enen enen en t phaset phase t phaset phase t phase The next big push towards democracy came after 1980, as democracy was revived in several countries of Latin America.
- One such country
- Myanmar, previously known as Burma.
- The quest for democracy in Burma
- the struggle of the people to live whole, meaningful lives as free and equal members of the world community.
- What
- the cartoonist saying here? ©Stephane P eray , Thailand, Cagle Cartoons Inc.
- This
- how the conversation took place: Farida: We have learnt that democracy has been expanding to more and more regions and countries all over the world.
- But what
- the difference between the two? If more and more countries become democratic, isn’t it obvious that the world also becomes more democratic? After all the Iraq war was all about taking democracy to that country.
- Their difference
- over the relationship among different countries.
- It
- quite possible, Rajesh, that the rulers of a country who are democratically elected by their people may want to dominate over other countries.
- That
- exactly what happened in the case of the war on Iraq.
- Who
- the president of the world? If there is no government, how can it be democratic or non-democratic? International OrganisationsInternational Organisations International OrganisationsInternational Organisations International Organisations Let us respond to the question that came up in this conversation: Does an increase in the number of democratic countries all over the world automatically lead to democratic relations among countries? Before we do that, let us think about the point raised by Surinder.
- There
- a government of India, a government of the United States of America, and so on.
Related PYQs (4)
2017•Prelims•Paper 2 (CSAT)•Q.17
"Rights are certain advantageous conditions of social well-being indispensable to the true development of the citizen." In the light of this statement, which one of the following is the correct understanding of rights?
Polity
2021•Prelims•Paper 1 (GS)•Q.89
With reference to India, consider the following statements :
1
There is only one citizenship and one domicile.
2
A citizen by birth only can become the Head of State.
3
A foreigner once granted the citizenship cannot be deprived of it under any circumstances.
Polity
2024•Mains•GS-II•Q.16
The Citizens' charter has been a landmark initiative in ensuring citizen-centric administration. But it is yet to reach its full potential. Identify the factors hindering the realisation of its promise and suggest measures to overcome them.
GS-II
2015•Prelims•Paper 2 (CSAT)•Q.23
The ultimate aim of government is not to rule or control by fear, nor to demand obedience, but conversely, to free every man from fear, that he may live in all possible security. In other words, to strengthen his natural right to exist and work without injury to himself or others. The object of government is not to change men from rational beings into beasts or puppets. It should enable them to develop their minds and bodies in security, and to employ their reason unshackled.
Which among the following is the most logical and rational inference that can be made from the above passage?
CSAT